Criminal  Procedure Law of People’s Republic of China is  the basic law regulating Chinese criminal procedure, which forms an important part  of socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics in China.The Chinese  criminal system has undergone significant changes in the past 30 years. It was  first adopted on July 1, 1979, and has been revised twice respectively in 1996  and 2012.
                      In the latest revision of Criminal  Procedure Law of People’s Republic of China, there are some progressive  innovations and breakthroughs, and new institutions were added to the law to  emphasize the respect and protection of human rights and the dominance of  criminal procedure by state organs. Effective control of crime is still the  fundamental of Chinese criminal procedure law.
 
 Introduction 
                    The object of  criminal trial is to determine criminal liability and its scope with joint  participation of the prosecutor, the defendant and the trial in order to punish  the crime and protect the human rights. So the criminal litigation system  somehow presents the relationship between the public power and individual  power and is significantly constrained by the purpose of criminal judicial  procedure.
 
1.	Basic Principles of Criminal Procedure 
                   
                      Principle of  Statutory Proceedings
                   
                    It aims to control and limit public  power and there are four main aspects about this principle: government shall  ensure the criminal procedure under the rule of law; State organs and staffs of  them who participate in criminal procedure shall act strictly in accordance  with Constitution and law; Establish and administrate legal sanction which  involves both in entity and in procedure; Exercise litigation supervision.
                
                      Principle of  Judiciary Independence
                
                    Principle of judiciary independence is  based on constitutional principle and it is a fundamental principle to resolve  the situation when there are interest conflicts between government and  individuals. It has two meanings: Only the courts established according to the  constitution and law and judges with legal qualifications can exercise judicial  power; Judge exercises judicial power only according to the constitution and  law but the intervention of legislation or execution or other judges from  higher court or the same court.
                
                      Principle of  Presumption of Innocence
             
                    The principle of presumption of  innocence is a commonly accepted principle in international society.It means the accused is held innocent until be proved  guilty. The presumption of the innocence of a criminal defendant is best  described as an assumption of innocence  in the absence of  contrary evidence. It  does not require that a mandatory inference favorable to the defendant  be drawn from any facts in evidence.
                    Principle of  Defense
               
                
                    The suspects or defendants shall have  the right to defend themselves or to be defended by pleaders and have the help  from pleaders in the entire proceedings. Moreover, the public security and  judicial organs shall have the duty to guarantee his defense.
             
                      Principle of  Equal Protection
              
                    The law applies equally  to all citizens and no privilege whatsoever is permissible before law. 
                      Principle of Duly  Act
                   
                    The specialized state organ shall  conduct criminal litigation procedure as soon as possible under the law,  avoiding all unnecessary delay.
                   
                      Special Principle  Implemented in China
                    √ Judge on Fact and Take the Law as the Criterion
                 
                    
In conducting criminal  proceedings, the People's Courts, the People's Procuratorates and the public  security organs must rely on the masses, base themselves on facts and take law  as the criterion. 
                   
                      √ Division of Responsibilities among Different Parties, Working in  Coordination and Restraining One Another
                    
In conducting criminal  proceedings, the People's Courts, the People's Procuratorates and the public  security organs shall divide responsibilities, coordinate their efforts and  check each other to ensure the correct and effective enforcement of law. 
                  √ The Supervision by the People’s Procuratorate
                 
                    
The People's  Procuratorates shall, in accordance with law, exercise legal supervision over  criminal proceedings. 
 
2.	Five Phases in Procedures 
The criminal procedure can be generally divided into fivephases: filing  a case, investigation, initiation of Public Prosecution, trail and execution.
  (1)Filing a case
Filing a case is  the  beginning of criminal procedure. In China, the public security organs, the  People's Procuratorates and the People’s Court shall have the power of filing a  case.
  Specifically, the public security organs or the People's  Procuratorates shall, upon discovering facts of crimes or criminal suspects,  file the cases for investigation within the scope of their jurisdiction. 
  Also, any unit or individual or the  victim shall have the right to report the case or provide information to a  public security organ, a People’s Procuratorate or a People’s Court. The public  security organ, the People’s Procuratorate or the People’s Court shall accept  all report, complaints and information. If a case does not fall under its  jurisdiction, it shall refer the case to the competent organ and notify the  person who made the report, lodged the complaint or provided the information.  If the case does not fall under its jurisdiction but calls for emergency  measures, it shall take emergency measures before referring the case to the  competent organ.(It also applies where an offender  delivers himself up to a public security organ, a People's Procuratorate or a  People's Court.
  
     
      State Organs | 
    Functional Jurisdiction( division of work    when deciding who shall directly handle the particular criminal case)  | 
  
  
    The Public Security Organs   | 
    Investigation in criminal cases shall be conducted    by the public security organs, except as otherwise provided by law.   | 
  
  
    The People’s Procuratorates   | 
    Crimes of embezzlement and bribery, crimes of    dereliction of duty committed by State functionaries, and crimes involving    violations of a citizen's personal rights such as illegal detention,    extortion of confessions by torture, retaliation, frame-up and illegal search    and crimes involving infringement of a citizen's democratic rights --    committed by State functionaries by taking advantage of their functions and    powers -- shall be placed on file for investigation by the People's    Procuratorates. If cases involving other grave crimes committed by State    functionaries by taking advantage of their functions and powers need be    handled directly by the People's Procuratorates, they may be placed on file    for investigation by the People's Procuratorates upon decision by the    People's Procuratorates at or above the provincial level.   | 
  
  
    The People’s    Court  | 
    Cases of private prosecution shall be handled    directly by the People's Courts.   | 
  
According to the law, the conditions of placing a case on file in criminal  proceedings include criminal facts and need of investigating the criminal  responsibility.If it believes that there are  facts of a crime and criminal responsibility should be investigated, it shall  file a case. If it believes that there are no facts of a crime or that the  facts are obviously incidental and do not require investigation of criminal  responsibility, it shall not file a case and shall notify the complainant of  the reason.
  If the complainant does  not agree with the decision, he may ask for reconsideration. 
(2)Investigation
Investigation is a criminal proceeding  in which investigation organs carry out specific investigation works and adopt compulsory measures under the  law to confirm crimes and arrest criminals. The subjects of this proceeding are  limited to the public security organs, the People’s Procuratorates, the state  security organs, prison and the security departments of the Army.
  Investigation
The investigation acts include  interrogation of the criminal suspect, questioning of the witnesses, inquest  and examination, search, seizure of material evidence and documentary evidence,  expert evaluation, electronic monitoring and wanted orders.
  The time limit for holding a criminal suspect in custody during  investigation after arrest shall not exceed two months. If the case is complex  and cannot be concluded within the time limit, an extension of one month may be  allowed with the approval of the People's Procuratorate at the next higher  level. Additionally, an extension of two months can be allowed upon approval or  decision by the People's Procuratorate of a province, autonomous region or  municipality directly under the Central Government according to Article 156.
  If due to special reasons, it is not appropriate to hand over a  particularly grave and complex case for trial even within a relatively long  period of time, the Supreme People's Procuratorate shall submit a report to the  Standing Committee of the National People's  Congress for approval of postponing the hearing of the case. 
  After a public security organ has concluded its investigation of  a case, it shall make a written recommendation for prosecution, which shall be  transferred, together with the case file and evidence, to the People's  Procuratorate at the same level for examination and decision. 
  compulsory measures 
The  compulsory measures include a warrant to compel the appearance of the criminal  suspect or defendant, order him to obtain a guarantor pending trial or subject  him to residential surveillance, obtaining a guarantor pending trial,  residential surveillance, detention and arrest.
  However,  for the compulsory measures are under the risk of invasion of human rights,  there are lots of restrictions and procedures adopting compulsory measures.
(3)Initiation of Public Prosecution
  Public Prosecution
All cases requiring initiation  of a public prosecution shall be examined for decision by the People's  Procuratorates. A People's Procuratorate  shall make a decision within one month on a case that a public security organ  has transferred to it with a recommendation to initiate a prosecution; an  extension of a half month may be allowed for major or complex cases.
  When a People's  Procuratorate considers that the facts of a criminal suspect's crime have been  ascertained, that the evidence is reliable and sufficient and that criminal  responsibility should be investigated according to law, it shall make a  decision to initiate a prosecution and shall, in accordance with the provisions  for trial jurisdiction, initiate a public prosecution in a People's Court.
  Otherwise, there are  three situations that a People’s Procuratorate shall make a decision not to  initiate: legal no prosecution, discretional non-prosecution and conditional  non-prosecution. A decision not to initiate a prosecution shall be announced  publicly, an objection can be raised by a public security organ or the victim.
  Private Prosecution
Cases of private  prosecution include the following:
  (1) cases to be handled  only upon complaint;(2) cases for which the victims have evidence to prove that  those are minor criminal cases; and(3) cases for which the victims have  evidence to prove that the defendants should be investigated for criminal responsibility  according to law because their acts have infringed upon the victims' personal  or property rights, whereas, the public security organs or the People's  Procuratorates do not investigate the criminal responsibility of the accused.
  After examining a case  of private prosecution, the People's Court shall decide whether to accept, and  also, mediation can be conducted; the private prosecutor may arrange a  settlement with the defendant or withdraw his prosecution before a judgment is  pronounced.
(4)Trail
Trials of cases of first  instance in the Primary, Intermediate People's Courts, the Higher People's  Courts and the Supreme People's Court shall be conducted by a collegial panel.  However, cases in which summary procedure is applied in the Primary People's Courts  may be tried by a single judge alone.
  First Instance
  
 1.General Procedure
√ Pretrial Procedure
In  Pretrial Procedure, a People’s Court shall examine if cases have achieved the  conditions of Hearing Procedure, if so, it shall get prepared for the next  procedure by proceeding with the following work: to determine the members of  collegial panel, to inform the accused to prepare his defence, to communicate  before trail, to send the notice of court session.
√Hearing Procedure
  ①pening
In  the opening of the court session, the presiding judge would check the parties  and announce the roll, name the relevant member and inform the parties of their  right to apply for withdrawal and also inform the accused of his right to defence.
②Court  Investigation
There  are three processes which shall go through in certain sequence in this session:  the public prosecutor may read out the bill of prosecution; and then the defendant and the victim present statements regarding  the crime accused in the bill of prosecution, the public prosecutor interrogates  the defendant; finally, evidence related to the case may be presented and  verified.
③Court Debate
  
With the permission of the presiding judge, the public prosecutor, the parties, the defenders and the agents ad litem may state their views on the evidence and the case, and they may debate with each other.
 
   
 
④Final Statement  of the Accused
⑤Deliberation and  Sentence by the collegial panel ( in secret; majority rule)
A People's Court shall  pronounce judgment on a case of public prosecution within two months or, three  months at the latest, after accepting it. Extensions are allowed in particular  situations with approval. 
2.Special Procedure
 ①The procedure of  cases with respect to private prosecution is simple and rather clear. The time limit of trials is relatively shorter.
  ②Summary  Procedure 
The People's Court may apply summary procedure to some small cases, which shall be tried by a single judge alone. 
  Second Instance
The  second instance shall conduct a complete review of  the facts determined and the application of law in the judgment of first  instance and shall not be limited by the scope of appeal or protest.
  Ways to appeal
1.If the defendant, private prosecutor or their legal  representatives refuse to accept a judgment or order of first instance made by  a local People's Court at any level, they have the right to appeal to the  People's Court at the next higher level. Defenders or near relatives of the  defendant may, with the consent of the defendant, file appeals. 
  2.If a local People's Procuratorate at any level  considers that there is some definite error in a judgment or order of first  instance made by a People's Court at the same level, it shall present a protest  to the People's Court at the next higher level.
  Time limit for an appeal or protest
If the victim or his  legal representative refuses to accept a judgment of first instance made by a  local People's Court at any level, he shall, within five days from the date of receiving the written judgment, have the  right to request the People's Procuratorate to present a protest. The People's  Procuratorate shall, within five days from the date of receiving the request  made by the victim or his legal representative, decide whether to present the  protest or not and give him a reply. 
  The time limit for an  appeal or a protest against a judgment shall be 10 days and the time limit for an appeal or a protest against an  order shall be five days; the time  limit shall be counted from the day after the written judgment or order is  received.
  Different results
  
    
      Different    situations  | 
      Results  | 
    
    
      if the original judgment was correct in the    determination of facts and the application of law and appropriate in the    meting out of punishment   | 
      the People's Court shall order rejection of the    appeal or protest and affirm the original judgment.   | 
    
    
      if the original judgment contained no error in the    determination of facts but the application of law was incorrect or the    punishment was inappropriately meted out   | 
      the People's Court shall revise the judgment.   | 
    
    
      if the facts in the original judgment were unclear    or the evidence insufficient   | 
      the People's Court may revise the judgment after    ascertaining the facts   | 
    
    
      it may rescind the original judgment and remand    the case to the People's Court which originally tried it for retrial(restriction: only once)  | 
    
    
      (1) violating the provisions of this Law regarding    trial in public; 
        (2) violating the withdrawal system; 
        (3) depriving the parties of their litigation rights prescribed by law or    restricting, such rights, which may hamper impartiality of a trial; 
        (4) unlawful formation of a judicial organization; or 
        (5) other violations against the litigation procedures prescribed by law which    may hamper impartiality of a trial.   | 
      If a People's Court of second instance discovers    that when hearing a case, a People's Court of first instance violates the    litigation procedures prescribed by law in one of the following ways, it    shall rule to rescind the original judgment and remand the case to the    People's Court which originally tried it for retrial   | 
    
  
 
(5)Execution
Judgments and orders shall be executed after they become legally  effective.
  - The People’s Courts are responsible for the  implementation of sentence of non-guilty, abatement and exemption of penalty,  fine penalty, confiscation of property and death.
 
  - The prison and the correctional centers for juvenile delinquents are  responsible for the implementation of sentence of fixed-term imprisonment, life imprisonment and death with a  two-year suspension of execution.
 
  - The public security organs are responsible for the implementation  of sentence of criminal detention and deprivation of political rights.
 
  - Community correction organizations are  responsible for the implementation of sentence of public  surveillance, imprisonment with a suspension of execution.
 
 
3.	Death Penalty Review
Death sentences shall be subject to approval by the Supreme  People's Court. The Supreme People’s Court can approve or resentence the case,  or remand the case for retrial.
A case where an Intermediate People's Court has imposed a death  sentence with a two-year suspension of execution, shall be subject to approval  by a Higher People's Court. A higher People’s Court can approve or resentence the  case, or remand the case for retrial. 
 
4.	Supervision Proceeding 
 
    A party or his legal representative or his near relative may  present a petition to a People's Court or a People's Procuratorate regarding a  legally effective judgment or order, however, execution of the judgment or  order shall not be suspended.
      If the president of a People's Court at any level finds some  definite error in a legally effective judgment or order of his court as to the determination  of facts or application of law, he shall refer the matter to the judicial  committee for handling.
      If the Supreme People's Court finds some definite error in a  legally effective judgment or order of a People's Court at any lower level, or  if a People's Court at a higher level finds some definite error in a legally  effective judgment or order of a People's Court at a lower level, it shall have  the power to bring the case up for trial itself or may direct a People's Court  at a lower level to conduct a retrial.
      If the Supreme People's Procuratorate finds some definite error  in a legally effective judgment or order of a People's Court at any level, or  if a People's Procuratorate at a higher level finds some definite error in a  legally effective judgment or order of a People's Court at a lower level, it  shall have the power to present a protest to the People's Court at the same  level against the judgment or order in accordance with the procedure for trial  supervision.
   
5.	Special Proceedings
 
    Beside  the proceedings mentioned above, there are several special proceedings existing  in particular cases for special purpose, such as, the  Juvenile Criminal Procedure, Foreign criminal procedure and  judicial assistance, criminal compensation procedure, Criminal compulsory  medical procedures, Special confiscation of illegal income etc.
 
 
________________________________________________________________________________
NOTICE: The material contained herein is in the nature of general comment and information ONLY and neither purports, nor is intended, to be advising on any particular matter. Readers should not act or rely upon any matter or information contained in or implied by the publication without taking appropriate professional advice.